首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of low-order aerodynamic models and RANS CFD for full scale 3D vertical axis wind turbines
【2h】

Comparison of low-order aerodynamic models and RANS CFD for full scale 3D vertical axis wind turbines

机译:全尺寸3D垂直轴风力涡轮机的低阶空气动力学模型和RANS CFD的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A Double Multiple Streamtube model, a free-wake vortex model (both widely used for vertical axis wind turbine design) and RANS CFD simulations are used in this work to predict the performance of the 17 m Vertical Axis Wind Turbine, field tested by Sandia National Laboratories. The three-dimensional, full scale calculations are compared with the experiments in terms of power coefficient, power and instantaneous turbine torque to assess the validity of each model. Additionally, the two aerodynamic models and RANS CFD are compared to each other in terms of thrust and lateral force. The two models and CFD agree well with the experiments at the turbine optimal tip speed ratio. However, away from the optimal tip speed ratio, the streamtube model significantly deviates from the experimental data and from the other numerical models. RANS CFD gives a good agreement with the experiments, slightly underestimating the power coefficient at every tip speed ratio tested. The vortex model proves to be a useful tool with a better accuracy than the streamtube model and a much lower computational cost compared to RANS CFD.
机译:这项研究使用了Double Multiple Streamtube模型,自由苏醒涡流模型(广泛用于垂直轴风力涡轮机设计)和RANS CFD仿真来预测17 m垂直轴风力涡轮机的性能,这是由Sandia National测试的实验室。将三维全尺寸计算与功率系数,功率和瞬时涡轮转矩方面的实验进行比较,以评估每个模型的有效性。此外,两个空气动力学模型和RANS CFD在推力和侧向力方面进行了比较。这两个模型和CFD与涡轮最佳叶尖速比下的实验非常吻合。但是,远离最佳的叶尖速度比,流管模型明显偏离了实验数据和其他数值模型。 RANS CFD与实验结果吻合得很好,在每个测试的叶尖速度比下,低估了功率系数。事实证明,与RANS CFD相比,涡流模型是一种有用的工具,其精度比流管模型更好,并且计算成本更低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号